Read the docs
← Crypto deposit APIs compared

deBridge alternatives for deposits. For deposits from any chain.

Checked October 27, 2026.

Why teams taking deposits look past deBridge

The user signs a transaction that locks funds in deBridge's contract on the source chain. A solver fills the order on the destination chain from its own liquidity, then unlocks the locked funds through deBridge's messaging.

Best for: DeFi apps whose users already sign from an EVM or Solana wallet and want a guaranteed rate. What teams taking deposits run into:

  • No deposit addresses: every order is a transaction the user signs, so users can't fund straight from an exchange.
  • No Bitcoin, Lightning or Hyperliquid HyperCore.
  • An unfilled order waits for the user to cancel it on the destination chain unless deBridge enables auto-cancel.

The alternatives

  1. 1. Flashnet

    Deposits, swaps and withdrawals API

    Best for: Exchanges, prediction markets and wallets whose users fund from anywhere, Bitcoin and Lightning included, by sending to an address.

    Choose Flashnet if users fund by sending from an exchange or any wallet, or if you need Bitcoin, Lightning, Hyperliquid's HyperCore, XRP or Zcash.

  2. 2. Relay

    Intent-based cross-chain protocol

    Best for: Apps whose users sign from connected wallets and want low published fees across a long list of chains.

  3. 3. NEAR Intents

    Intent-based cross-chain protocol with competing market makers

    Best for: Swaps across a very wide set of chains with competing market makers, where per-quote addresses are enough.

  4. 4. LI.FI

    Cross-chain bridge and DEX aggregator

    Best for: Wallets that want one SDK over many bridges and DEXs for swaps their users sign.

How they compare

On the points above, with each fact linked to its source. Every provider on every point is on the comparison page.

deBridge alternatives for deposits, as of October 27, 2026
FlashnetdeBridgeRelayNEAR IntentsLI.FI
Orders
Deposit by sending to an addressYesEvery quote returns a deposit address; paying it creates the order. No wallet connection, approval or contract call.SourceNoEvery order is a transaction the user signs. No deposit-address flow is documented.SourceYesA quote can return a deposit address instead of a transaction to sign.SourceYesA 1Click quote returns a deposit address on the origin chain; the swap starts when funds arrive.SourcePartlySmart Deposit Addresses are an enterprise feature, enabled per integrator. Native ETH and BNB can't be the input.Source
Automatic refundsYesOrders that can't fill within the quote's bounds go back to the refund address you set.SourcePartlyBy default the user cancels on the destination chain. Auto-cancel needs deBridge's approval, and refunds usually arrive as USDC.SourceYesRefunds go to the refundTo address on the origin chain, less gas. Without one, there's no automatic refund.SourceYesUnfilled or underpaid deposits go to your refundTo address after the deadline.SourcePartlyIf a bridge step lands but the swap after it fails, the user is refunded in the bridged asset on the destination chain.Source
Networks
BitcoinYesNative BTC on Bitcoin L1, in and out.SourceNoSupported chains are EVM chains, Solana and TRON.SourceYesNative BTC, by wallet signature or deposit address.SourceYesLegacy, SegWit and Taproot addresses.SourceYesBy wallet-signed transaction; Bitcoin as a deposit-address source is in beta.Source
LightningYesIn and out over Lightning, including BOLT11 invoices and Lightning addresses.SourceNoNot among the supported chains.SourceNoNot among the chains in Relay's API.SourceNoNot among the supported chains.SourceNoNot among LI.FI's chains.Source
Hyperliquid (HyperCore)YesUSDC and USDe delivered to HyperCore.SourceNoHyperEVM is listed; HyperCore isn't.SourceYesPerps and spot USDC, and other spot tokens.SourcePartlyUSDC only, to the perps balance.SourceYesDeposits, withdrawals and spot swaps.Source