Read the docs
← Crypto deposit APIs compared

Flashnet vs NEAR Intents for deposits

For deposits from any chain. Checked October 27, 2026.

The short answer

Choose Flashnet if users should keep one address for every deposit, you want Bitcoin deposits credited before confirmation, or you want Lightning, fiat in and out, and webhooks.

Choose NEAR Intents if you want market makers competing on every quote, need chains such as TON or Stellar, or are happy with an address per quote.

Read the docs

How each works

Flashnet

Users send to the address on a quote, or to their own permanent address, and Flashnet settles on the destination network, filling from onchain liquidity and its own markets. It holds no user balances; its settlement workers run in AWS Nitro enclaves whose identity integrators can verify.

NEAR Intents

Through its 1Click API, market makers compete to quote each swap, which settles atomically on NEAR's verifier contract. Assets from other chains are bridged into NEAR Intents and withdrawn to the destination chain.

Side by side

Each fact links to the page it came from.

Flashnet vs NEAR Intents for deposits, as of October 27, 2026
FlashnetNEAR Intents
Orders
Deposit by sending to an addressYesEvery quote returns a deposit address; paying it creates the order. No wallet connection, approval or contract call.SourceYesA 1Click quote returns a deposit address on the origin chain; the swap starts when funds arrive.Source
Permanent address per userYesOne permanent address per user and source chain. Every eligible deposit converts to the destination you set.SourcePartlyAddresses belong to one quote and expire at its deadline. Reusable ANY_INPUT addresses are partner-only and funded inside NEAR Intents.Source
Firm quotesYesA quote's price holds for 2 minutes within your slippage. Fixed-output quotes commit to the amount out.SourcePartlyOutput bounded by your slippage and a deadline you set. No fixed window in which the price holds.Source
Automatic refundsYesOrders that can't fill within the quote's bounds go back to the refund address you set.SourceYesUnfilled or underpaid deposits go to your refundTo address after the deadline.Source
Networks
BitcoinYesNative BTC on Bitcoin L1, in and out.SourceYesLegacy, SegWit and Taproot addresses.Source
LightningYesIn and out over Lightning, including BOLT11 invoices and Lightning addresses.SourceNoNot among the supported chains.Source
Bitcoin credited before confirmationYesEligible deposits can be credited before the first confirmation, for a fee. Otherwise after 1 confirmation.SourceNoCredited once mined; the API notes Bitcoin may take around an hour.Source
Hyperliquid (HyperCore)YesUSDC and USDe delivered to HyperCore.SourcePartlyUSDC only, to the perps balance.Source
SolanaYesSOL, USDC, USDT and other SPL tokens.SourceYesSOL and SPL tokens.Source
TronYesTRX and USDT.SourceYesTRX and TRC-20 tokens.Source
XRPYesXRP.SourceYesClassic addresses with destination tags aren't supported through 1Click.Source
ZcashYesZEC.SourcePartlyTransparent addresses only.Source
Fiat
Fiat inYesUsers pay from Cash App or Strike over Lightning and receive BTC or stablecoins.SourceNot documented
Fiat outYesPay out a deposited asset to a Cash App username or a Lightning address.SourceNot documented
Operations
Your own fee on every orderYesSet a fee per order or per affiliate, from 1 to 9,999 bps, and claim it on the chain and asset you choose.SourceYesApp fees in bps, up to 500 bps combined.Source
Sanctions and AML screeningYesSource and destination addresses checked with Elliptic and other providers on every order.SourceYesQuotes screened with TRM Labs, Binance AML and other providers.Source
WebhooksYesWebhooks, plus a server-sent event stream of order status.SourceNoPoll the status endpoint by deposit address.Source
Platform feeSet per partner and route, and itemized on every quote.Source20 bps with an API key (1 bp on stablecoin and same-asset routes), 25 bps without, plus a 0.0001% protocol fee.Source
Support24/7, with direct access to the engineers who run settlement.A Telegram community and a partner portal. No published SLA.Source

Where Flashnet wins

What teams taking deposits run into with NEAR Intents:

  • Deposit addresses belong to one quote and go inactive at its deadline, after which the API warns funds may be lost.
  • Bitcoin waits to be mined, which the API puts at around an hour, and there's no Lightning.
  • No webhooks: integrations poll for status.

Where NEAR Intents is strong

  • One of the widest chain lists, from EVM chains to Bitcoin forks, Solana, Tron, TON, XRP and Stellar.
  • Market makers compete on every quote, and settlement is atomic on NEAR.
  • Low list fees, with 1 bp on stablecoin and same-asset routes.

Weighing more than two? See NEAR Intents alternatives for deposits or every provider side by side. Comparing swaps? See Flashnet vs NEAR Intents for swaps.

Questions

Are NEAR Intents 1Click deposit addresses reusable?

Not for ordinary quotes. A 1Click deposit address belongs to one quote and goes inactive at the deadline you set; the API warns that funds sent after it may be lost. The reusable ANY_INPUT type is limited to authorized partners and is funded from a NEAR Intents account, not by an onchain transfer. Flashnet's standing addresses stay with a user for every deposit.

How long do Bitcoin deposits take on NEAR Intents and Flashnet?

1Click credits Bitcoin once the deposit is mined, and its API notes this may take around an hour. Flashnet can credit eligible Bitcoin deposits before the first confirmation, for a fee, and takes Lightning deposits, which NEAR Intents doesn't list.

Does NEAR Intents have webhooks?

The 1Click API documents no webhooks; integrations poll a status endpoint by deposit address. Flashnet sends webhooks and also streams order status as server-sent events.